Jump to content

Bring Back The Old Review System From JKFiles


Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't know about you guys but the thing that made browsing through mods (even an onslaught of lightsaber models) that much more interesting was the inclusion of a review done by someone other than the author. The 5 star rating system has been given as much attention to it as the old thumbs up/thumbs down system and if possible (not sure how many willing members there could be) a team of critics could be organised and each assigned to review something. It just made the modding aspect of the site that much more engaging and whats not to love about Averus Retruthan's near psychotic reviews :P.

 

I undeerstand there's probably some huge flaw in implementing this system that I'm missing but I'm curious to hear your thoughts on it.

Zappa_0, Jango40, Merek and 1 other like this
Posted

It's definitely an idea that we've tossed around since JKHub's birth. We wanted the reviews to be more community based, rather than staff based. Members, or groups of critics, are free to go and write reviews, and maybe the author can include it in the description. But as for the staff reviewing each file, it's just not quite feasible.

 

If you'd like to start a team of critics, that'd be awesome, and I'd love to join.

Posted

A team of critics would be awesome :P From being a staff on both JKFiles/JKHub, the staff here usually have more work to do and critiquing files properly takes time and effort. Something I applaud JKFiles for, because in my opinion they've had some great reviewers e.g. Nozy, Inyri etc.

therfiles likes this
Posted

Agreed. PM me if you are interesting in pursuing a "critics group"-like idea. :D

 

Here are some reviews I've written in the past:

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents


 

Posted

I think if the website crew would do reviews it was give jkhub more of a face. Kinda think of it as a radio disjockey. People sometimes like reading the reviews plus gives the crew more things to do then just approving a file. Or even doing a blog to review files would be cool.

Posted
  On 1/18/2014 at 9:24 PM, Zappa_0 said:

I think if the website crew would do reviews it was give jkhub more of a face. Kinda think of it as a radio disjockey. People sometimes like reading the reviews plus gives the crew more things to do then just approving a file. Or even doing a blog to review files would be cool.

We do a lot more than just approve files as staff.

 

I usually leave a review after approving a file if I'm interested enough to fully test it. But I did this even before becoming staff.

Posted
  On 1/18/2014 at 9:36 PM, minilogoguy18 said:

I don't like staff reviews or a panel of critics, it makes for biased reviews, people should just rate files more.

 

That's certainly true, but in-depth reviews just aren't being written. And sure: would there be a bias? Yep. Do all members here have a bias? Absolutely. And, it's not like this group we're proposing would replace all the user-reviews, nothing at all like that. It's just a group of members who are committing to review files in an orderly, thought out way.

Posted

Well another downside to it is what happened at jk3files.com was files were taking a long time to get hosted because staff members got burnt out on reviewing every file since that means playing with it for a proper amount of time, looking for any bugs then writing a paragraph, sometimes 3 about the mod.

 

I just think it's a waste of time for everyone. I like how much faster everything is uploaded here, sure at first things wouldn't take much longer but eventually the people assigned to the job will get burnt out, I guarantee it.

 

Then once everyone starts slowing down then things really get into a bottleneck and it takes weeks for a simple mod to get hosted.

Unifermius and eezstreet like this
Posted

We're not (at least I'm not) suggesting that a file has to be reviewed before It gets uploaded. It's just an extra we'd tack on later. And since it'll be made of users, the staff won't get burnt-out, unless they decide to participate extensively. :P

 

So, in essence, it's just a group of people who love to review mods. That's it. It's up to the author if they want to tack it on to their description. It's not anything essential, just a commitment to quality reviews.

Boothand likes this
Posted

If this group gets formed, it should just set out to leave in depth reviews in the review section. Adding a review to the mod description seems a bit silly to me, since there is a review section.

therfiles likes this
Posted

Definitely, @@Circa. We'd write our reviews in the comments section. We're not gonna get any special privelages. But, if the author chooses, they can tack the review on to their description. I've seen that done a couple times.

Circa likes this
Posted
  On 1/19/2014 at 2:14 AM, DarthDementous said:

Hardly anyone reads or actively participates in the comment section though :\.

This is not true. Many people do, if they feel the mod deserves a review. The "comment section" is technically the review section. Most people just treat it as a comment section.

 

One idea I've had is to limit the review section to real reviews by people, and let the staff approve them, instead of how it is now, where anyone can write anything.

 

Posted

Comments section is actually quite popular, and I think a review system would be great as long as it was an extra as @@therfiles said, not a requirement before a file went up.

 

And of course reviews are biased, that's a big part of it :P they're playing it from the perspective of a first time user based on their own experience rather than a collective experience.

 

Quite honestly though, this doesn't require anything official or any site changes so any one could write a review and post it in the comments section. This is what @@Caelum aimed for the comments section to be in the first place afterall XD this was discussed at length back then.

therfiles likes this
  • 3 months later...
Posted

I solely create files for them to be reviewed by the community but it would be far more effective if the staff actually reviewed our files before they are published like they did originally on JK3Files. Nothing against the current system but it would paint a far superior picture of what it was like back when JKA was more active, please consider this staff.

Posted

Perhaps there could be a group of people who (if enough are interested in doing this) could review files when they get uploaded, and so when the file gets approved and made "public", there would be the review along with it. But this would depend on having a group of people who have the time to do it whenever a file goes up.

Boothand likes this
Posted

I always try to leave reviews on content that i download from her.  Yes i know sometimes my reviews can be what the author doesn't want to hear but truth makes talent stronger.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...