Jump to content

R.M.S. Titanic - AngelModder


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well it's acctually going quiet well atm, the hull is not the issue as is the time consuming effort being put into the textures. the map sits (exterior only) at around 9980 brushes atm, which is better then when I began cleaning up yesterday as it was around 10230 I believe?! I've managed to work in a LOT of new accuracies. Here's an example of the new promenade deck texture, doing it this way allowed me to make it one brush vs seven, even in area's where stairwells need cut out it still saves me a ton of brush work ergo FPS. I've already seen an increase by 5 points off just cleaning up the first 90 feet of A deck's superstructure. Their's still MANY areas to be cleaned/brush reduced, here is two examples however. This is definitely NOT a new method just a more involved one and new for this project... A2.jpgPainintheass.jpg

 

Btw if any one has a more effective way of doing this please speak up, so far it's a in and out method that takes about 5 minutes a window, I have the horizontal spacing down however as you can see in the grid etc, the ship is not straight (so the windows are not as well). A simple fix would be to make that piece out of a patch, but I try to avoid over excessive use of patches personally. So the vertical spacing is what take's time to adjust with each window doing it with a brush. For the floors (laughs manically) its a pain -_-! the example one here was fairly simple, but when the teak boards curve around the deck housing etc it can become very annoying and take a while.

Posted

There is some slight misinterpreted hostility going on here and I'd like to point out that nobody has said anything offensive, yet. Let's just keep this thread on the topic of the project, and feel free to discuss "who did what" privately, or just move on.

Posted

Brush count started today at 10,128 as of this moment it is currently sitting at 9,652 Brushes

Adjusted all web framing to be more accurate from 48 inches down to the proper 36 inches. (this added about a dozen brushes over the original layout, but was necessary for the detail to be true. Vs the loss of brushes today I'm still way ahead.)

Adjusted all outboard frames from 36 inches to the proper 72 inches for the enclosed promenade

Adjust all aft outboard frames from 72 inches to 108 inches (this has caused a line up issue that I'll have to work on resolving).

combined all A deck floor brushes into 50 X 93 Ft (different for some spots) sections (rather then chopped up to form around each housing gutters etc) this eliminated 226 brushes down to 22 brushes (texture's for this are still being designed). The idea is simple let the texture do all the detail of the teak boards gutters and flooring as ONE larger HD texture for each 50 X 93 foot section. This reduces FPS draw as well as brings in new detail.

Combined the forward enclosed promenade brushes back to there original 50 (some odd) foot sections reducing the brush count by another 500 (some odd) brushes down to 10 (5 on each side). This will probably drop down to 3-4 on each side once the new promenade texture's are complete as I'll be doing the expansion joints on the textures.

Adjusted all B deck deck frames to the proper 36 Inches (this added about a dozen brushes over the original layout, but was necessary for the detail to be true. Vs the loss of brushes today I'm still way ahead.)

Built new accurate gear box under the bridge on the roof of A deck and corrected the forward framing it attaches to, this was in total an addition of 16 brushes and 8 patches.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTES BY ANGELMODDER

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The brush count in many other area's will be reduced even further for the exterior, my goal is to drop it down to about 8,500 - no more than 9,000. Another idea came to me today that may be able to reduce this even further possibly as low as 7,500 -8,000.
By eliminating the original procedure for the windows on Boat, A, And B decks and swapping it with the new one I've been using for the Promenade enclosure the brush count and fps could be significantly improved (possibly). The originals call for the walls to be cut, a window texture then fit in at grid 2, and behind it with a grid one spacing sits a grid one nodraw piece with the said windows glow (and most importantly area of view reflection specular). The new process would eliminate the 6 brushes in total process for just one window down to JUST one brush, however, while the windows glow (for night versions) would remain, all versions would suffer the loss of the reflection env (taking away from the realism intended) and it's ability to cast light from the actual window its self. As well any env I apply to the actual metal's surface would apply to the entire thing (the windows wooden frame glass etc) and would break the realism of doing them as separate bits.
The "BETA" version you have all seen never used the shaders I had designed that will not only add a proper metallic env to thing's but also add bloom effect to the surfaces and lighting hits.
To surmise I am torn between aesthetic true detail and functionality. If during the next week or so I manage to find some one willing to help with the vis of this map, I will continue on as originally intended with not only the original realistic window design but other details I had planned (interior etc). It all comes down and hinges on one thing. I NEED HELP... The vis work needed for a map of this type is beyond simple hallway and area-portal etc vis I am use to. The map compiles lighting and meta of-course, but at this point Vis compile says screw you to me. I need an expert...

More details will come over the next weeks. Hopefully some one who knows what to do will read this and understand, I've been working on this idea since 2005, it all come's down to this next two months... Will it be the map it should be, or fail like the Beta did in my eyes.
10917138_773325122720949_655895029153491

Posted

To be truthful, I don't really remember ever being on Map-Craft. I did a search through my email, and neither "map-craft" or "map craft" brought up any results, which means I either deleted the map-craft registration email (i don't normally delete that stuff though, but maybe) or it went to my Junk mail and was swept by the system. I do believe you though, as I have a tendency to be a dick to people and fuck shit up majorly. I apologize for that, but it's part of my nature. I would've changed the post, had you not quoted it/seen it already.

 

Anyway, I think the approach you are taking with the ship is wrong. Instead of the ship being a moving entity, the water and everything else ought to be moving, for the reasons I stated above. The argument you stated above isn't really valid, because it doesn't actually make any sense. For example, in the Flintstones and other older cartoons, the background is moving when there is high velocity movement (ie, the Flintstones' vehicle), instead of the actual people moving onscreen. Now granted, we're working with the Titanic here and not The Flintstones, but the same principle could apply here too.

 

I suppose that would depend on the angle that you take with the ship. If you're going for something like James Cameron's film, this would be difficult and look very bad, especially with the ship splitting in half. But you could also try a different approach here as well, by making a teleporter system that transports the player to different versions of the interior: one for vertical, one for half-way vertical, one for the ship-split occurring and one for "normal". In these sections, the ship would slowly change to match the variations in the different sections. Unfortunately this is going to not be perfectly seamless, which I imagine is what you were going for.

 

To accomplish this, it'd require some pretty complicated ICARUS scripts, but it's feasible. First, the easy bits: you'd need to change the target/targetname of the main teleporter that leads into the ship's interior, and the destination when leaving. Easy enough, I suppose. But then you would have to worry about the actual people in the interiors, they would need to move too. So, you might make a giant teleporter in those interior sections that remains deactivated until you need to actually swap. There would be a scriptrunner as well which gets run, and calculates the position of the destination (in the next interior section) based on 8 ref_tags which are at the vertices of the triggers. From these ref_tags, get the position of the activator and add it to the origin of the next section's ref_tags, taking into account the angle of the ship.

 

Now, that's all supposing that you actually do get FPS issues. Like you say above, others get better FPS on your maps, but I'm still a little concerned about the FPS and entity counts (and to a lesser extent, the actual choppiness of collision due to JA's fantabulous collision prediction system) because it's a giant func_static being moved as opposed to a section of BSP that has a background around it. I suppose this is all contingent on the level of detail used in the interior, but I digress.

Ok I appolgize for coming at you like a prick last year, I was having a rough time of it. Any ways, let me explain some thing's. theirs 2 versions so far I'm working on. allow me to break it down.

 

A: is exterior only (this will be a FFA/CTF map the flags being at either end of the ship tons of guns inbetween, mostly to make it useful) the water would be set to kill as its running a shader to make it appear the ship is moving this is combined witha bow splash effect and shader wakes etc. First thing I had to do with this was to make the water a solid surface (players going beneath the water showed a problem where the blue effect of the water didnt seem to work and a fog looked horrible against the skybox I tried a dozen or so different ideas). Finally I resolved to just make the surface solid and place a trigger kill, this was effective as you would've been left by the ship in real life and died, etc etc, the RP of it.

So the world AROUND the ship (with shaders etc) is what gives her the image of moving. I did this same trick with the night time version/sinking.

 

The problem I am incountering with (A) is this, the ship  angles up towards the bow, and toward the stern, the only level place in the hull was acctually the 75 feet where the main engines sat I wanted to add this bit of realism as without it it just kills the look of the ship. It especially messes with the timing and effect of her sinking. As parts are going under before they should vs the ships angle etc. the trouble comes in at HOW it had to be designed, the floors/cielings of A deck (the main deck were people will be running around is this and the boat deck) is sat as 1 (4unit) thick piece the top textured to be the boat decks decking, and the underside of it the cieling of the A deck promenade. in hind sight this was a mistake for many reasons. I can amend it to a point by making it two separate pieces each 2 units thick. (I could possibly adjust it, but that puts it at 2 X 8 = 16 units and that's WAY to thick realistically that's over a foot thick, the real one was 3 inches at most for that floor/ceiling. A deck is not so much the problem fps wise as is the boat deck etc, theirs lots of vents and other structures and details on this level of the ship. So all in all the hint portal method (due to the thickness of the walls etc not being enough for realism) fails here... It wont even work. Hinting MAY, but I am unsure as to how to apply this. I've went through and set any thing thats not the floors, wall,s or ceilings to detail, if some guidance could be given as to what to do next, it'd be appreciated, hell I'll even hand it over and let you show me what needs to be done, fuck at this point I'll admit and ask for help.

 

The last and final issue (and this may be soon resolved by me going through the exterior lately and getting rid of about 2000 brushes) is that when ever i ATTEMPT a vis compile I get the "Max_Map_Visibility_Acceded" error I've tried tinkering with many of the world spawn setting's but to no effect, at this point it's even in a VERY small sky box area and it still makes no difference.

 

B - once im done cleaning up version A will be given it's interior, now by area portal this vis wise wont be a problem, but if I can't eliminate the "Max_Map_Visibility_Acceded" error I feel it will always feel some drag.

 

C and D would be the same idea's as above but sinking, again as you mentioned I want to keep this seamless as possible. As I've reduced the idea for how MUCH interior will be included down to just the Aft and forward Grand staircase the B and C Deck hallways and the Dinning saloon, it wouldn't be that bad.

 

The final version will be just for duelers, it's the starn sitting at 23-24 degrees listing to port 12 degrees just before she split, her lights flicking, noises all over the place etc. so you get to duel on her in her final moments, and of course the water would be deadly. but it creates an interesting platform jump duel map.

 

I hope this has explained the difficult situation I am in...

 

@@eezstreet

Posted

Here is the latest WIP shot I was willing to show, theirs a lot more to come, but I fell behind on my dead line for the update sadly. Not to imply that I haven't been working on it. On the contrary in fact. The hull is complete all accept the new textures which are about 75% complete, lots of little details to work on and it still needs it's portholes. It should be noted the inside and outside so far are running around 75-90 fps, completely vis'd off from each other and stable via area portals and of course lots of hinting. The doors/area portaling take a while to set up as each door will rotate in proper fashion.
The below shot is of the Grand Staircase so far, only 2 days in on this particular piece. The cherub will improve, I actually brush built it.This was ofcourse a without dynamic glow enabled shot. I run the QEffects Pro so I felt it was wise to take my pictures in raw format as to not deceive. I do appoligize for the delay and not showing more, however each area and thing take's a lot of research so that slows down the process as times.

Any ways hope you enjoy!

AngelModder @Lizardking

 

10498704_777010789019049_705823356245813

Posted

:o I'm amazed to see you still working at this magnificent map - I remember seeing a WIP thread of you on Filefront (yeah back then it was still Filefront - not Gamefront) Forums

I think you even asked me to help you with the model for that angel statue there, back in atime where I just started modeling :D

AngelModder likes this
Posted

HAHA, yea I never found some one to make it, so last night I said screw it and built it myself out of patches and turned it into an ase. Still working on the texture set for it. That seems to be my major slow down these days. I can map it faster then I can make textures for it.

Posted

You've done a fantastic job, but you should be making this for CS:GO for example, Jedi Academy players will not appreciate this as much as a FirstPersonShooter community.

VALVE would definetly be interested in this, and with Valve_Hammer, you could do a lot more. A few roleplayers pretending to be DiCaprio few times a week/ month(?) is not worth all this effort.

AngelModder likes this
Posted

You've done a fantastic job, but you should be making this for CS:GO for example, Jedi Academy players will not appreciate this as much as a FirstPersonShooter community.

VALVE would definetly be interested in this, and with Valve_Hammer, you could do a lot more. A few roleplayers pretending to be DiCaprio few times a week/ month(?) is not worth all this effort.

Well the great thing is, I'll be able to port it over relatively easily once it's complete. Starting off in JKA seemed like a good idea. Build it in the hardest to please engine then work my way up.

 

Trust and believe folk's you haven't seen ANY THING yet. I'm holding back the really good stuff until I polish it some more.

z3filus likes this
Posted

You've done a fantastic job, but you should be making this for CS:GO UE4 for example, Jedi Academy players will not appreciate this as much as a FirstPersonShooter community.

Fixed that for you :P

 

See this for example:

Posted

Speaking of ut4, after Titanic I will be saying farewell to the JKA community and moving to it permanently. In many ways that is why I HAVE to finish Titanic, it is my good bye.

Posted

Speaking of ut4, after Titanic I will be saying farewell to the JKA community and moving to it permanently. In many ways that is why I HAVE to finish Titanic, it is my goodbye.

 

Every time a legendary modder such as yourself says goodbye to JKA, half of the community leaves and almost completely kills the game. This will not end well, I can assure you that much. In any case, farewell and good luck AngelModder you shall be missed by all.

Posted

NO offense, but both of you are being way too dramatic. If you wake me up in the middle of the night, ask me to name a mapper, I'd say SJC or SSID. 

And if anyone has ever Uninstalled JKA after a modder retires from it, I'd say that's a foolish thing to do. After all, there are plenty of tutorials on how to

create a map, a skin, playermodel.. etc. This game can be addictive though, it is never 100% sure someone leaves for good. Waiting to see Titanic.

eezstreet and AshuraDX like this
Posted

Speaking of ut4, after Titanic I will be saying farewell to the JKA community and moving to it permanently. In many ways that is why I HAVE to finish Titanic, it is my good bye.

you won't do it

 

a few weeks ago I thought I'd just stop, only stying with the community

teaching others while moving on to newer engines - and that wasn't the first time I thought about this

so far I allways came back after a few months

z3filus likes this
Posted

Exactly,  I recently decided to just forget about the Radiant and Create maps for CS:GO --- I'm now mapping for both  :7

 

It's good to take a time out of anything in life, and then come back to whatever it is you left, with fresh ideas and altogether a better feeling.

Posted

Well I should say I DOUBT i will make another map for JKA. I've been at it for over a decade now, and I miss UT modding, the new ut4 engine is amazing and I cant wait to really get to making some thing in it. I can say exactly why I always come back to JKA, in JKA thing's are hard to make look good, in newer engines it's easy. JKA modding especially mapping is a challenge to make some thing work and be beautiful. Btw I'll be posting up some picture's later tonight of the Grand staircase, I got more of that area done (lowered its brush count and upped its fps by 5 points as well). And I am currently working on a new dome texture and fine tuning the lighting. So far the entire map is coming together nicely. While I haven't posted pictures of the ships exterior there are reasons. It is built (no major details yet) I don't wish to show it till I have the new hull textures fully complete and working.

I owe much to JKA, After a early failure in UT on a bushiness note that led to a good 5 year confusion of identities I was lucky to learn under some great folks like Lizard King and Darth G, there skill and work shaped me in JKA and beyond. Many have asked me why is making Titanic so important. Well it's simple, I'm poor so I could never own a life size replica that I could explore, and even if you have some one else s 3d model, it's not the same as having your own you can adjust and fix, and add on to. The process of making it more then what it was is a addictive challenge. In JKA I can script every second of the ships demise, and her break up sent chills through me during the last few test runs. I feel in the end people are going to be shocked by more then just the physical appeal this map bring's to there screen but find them selves understanding (along with 31 other players) just what those final moments were really like.
In the early days Darth G, Lk, and a few others use to run around shooting each other with rocket launchers in my earliest attempts at this map. I feel this time it will be different when people see how much detail has been poured into this, every thing from the ship, to the textures and a very important hing "sound". It is amazing how just flickering lights and groaning metal can suddenly kill the fun and plunge you into fear even through a screen.

Any ways keep your eyes sharp, picture's are coming tonight!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...