Circa

@@eezstreet this is slightly off-topic but did you implement ADS into GSA? That would be pretty cool to have in JKA with these new gun models.

Oh I totally agree. I kept my Prequel Music Replacement files at 320kbps, and the size refects that. I'd be glad too. I may work on that soon then.

I was planning on doing exactly that actually. I have all the soundtracks on CD, so I have uncompressed WAVs of them as well. But yeah, 320kbps will be tons better, but will also be almost twice as big in file size.

Well let's hear it. though I still think it's unnecessary. Like Pande said, music for movies and games are mixed different than a top 40 album would be. It's missing some "oomph" because it shouldn't overtake the rest of the audio mix of the game. We should work on the other sounds primarily. Also, what kind of speakers do you have? I think the audio is decently balanced in the game, for being as old as it is, but I use some decent studio monitors.

Could be, though you'd think it would go by the time you have set in your account. Odd.

Just start a new topic and it gives them under the title entry bar.

@@Cerez the tags have been added.

@@Onysfx is our mascot.

He means the Aqualish species.

Yep, make a thread in that section. That is indeed what it is for.

I thought they were too big. And unrealistic looking. But maybe it's just me.

By hardcoded, do you mean that you can't make a new animation for it? I know @@katanamaru was working on something like that.

This. Works wonders. And I was not aware it was available on Windows now. Used to be Mac-exclusive.

It really should have been released separately. But I guess that would be up to the @@MovieBattles II Team, wouldn't it?

http://circa.im/files/jka/Ben.pk3 @@DT85 weren't you involved with this model? And yes, it has unhooded and unrobed versions I believe.

Ah, you're right. I actually didn't mean normalizing with a plugin, but manually normalizing by making it relatively all the same volume, getting rid of the dynamics. Exactly. Each audio element needs to blend well, without canceling each other out. Otherwise it will be muddy, and many sounds will get buried.

As I've stated before in other threads, "good" is an opinion. You can't tell something they are wrong for their opinion. They think it's good. Sure you can be all scientific about it and say the majority of adults think the show isn't as good as the OT, but I bet you could get about the same amount of kids and others to say it's good or even better than the OT. Also, saying that it's not Star Wars is a bit ignorant, at least to use in this argument. It is Star Wars. It's been labeled as official canon. You may hate that fact and establish your own set of canon, but you can't force others to. Just because a general consensus of an opinion is the norm doesn't mean the opposing opinion is wrong. You say it's bad, Ceres says its good. Disagreement happens. Let's move on from this pointless debate on what good and bad is.

That could be pretty cool actually!

The model in MBII is even better.

Okay I had a listen. Honestly it probably isn't going to be different enough to be worth your time. Normalizing the music isn't really necessary, because the dynamic range is there for a reason. It's already been mastered twice anyway, so it's pretty balanced as well. Like I said, you will only achieve what you're wanting properly if you had the original tracks or stems. For something that is meant to be fairly background in the overall mix of audio, the time and effort is better spent on other things.

WAT. I say Omicron. I only occasionally refer to you as Omnicorn. I'm very particular about pronouncing things correctly.

Remastering? Or re-editing? Can't view the link from my phone at the moment. Remastering would only be achieved properly with the original tracks or at least the stems.

Ah I see. Seems redundant to me. I'd rather buy the plugin. Just can't at the moment. Also, I love how you called @@minilogoguy18 minilegoguy and totally butchered @@AshuraDX's name as well. bravo to you!

I'm a part of the majority of conversations on this forum and never reached it. but I see your point, definitely. I'll raise it to 45 and see if that helps a little.