-
Posts
525 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News Articles
Tutorials
Forums
Downloads
Everything posted by Link
-
I went with 12, something about it seems very appealing... and besides I much prefer lighter layouts/backgrounds
-
Any news on this ? By the way, I'll be forming this very soon, it's my priority and I'll be PMing everyone interested privately soon.
-
WIP Fixing the dotXSI 3.0 Exporter for 3ds Max...
Link replied to Archangel35757's topic in WIPs, Teasers & Releases
I always slightly modify the zip title in order to avoid potentially overwriting duplicate files in Dropbox (It does not warn you before overwriting) to ensure users could always have a link to older versions of a file. I've renamed them back for you. -
Truly beautiful, I adore maps of this theme and I adore attention to detail even more. This is really fantastic can'can't wait to see the final product if you do plan to add more.
-
The name is definitely memorable...*looks through emails* Ah yeah I emailed you a little over a year ago to see if JKHub could have permission to host your JKA files, but the mail bounced back unfortunately. @@Zappa_0 Are these yours? http://jediknight3.filefront.com/developer/Darth_Zappa;8357 Welcome back to the community and welcome to the hub
-
WIP Fixing the dotXSI 3.0 Exporter for 3ds Max...
Link replied to Archangel35757's topic in WIPs, Teasers & Releases
Approved -
Should be better now
-
We simply cannot check every single file for copyright infringement, it's up to the author to check his/her files and credit those who he used content from (And ask permission themselves, unrelated to JKHub). If a report is made, and it is genuine, then we'll take swift and immediate action to take the file in question down. Any content that is obvious to us e.g. if Eez uploaded a map by Sith-J-Cull and claimed it as his own or if Futuza uploaded that well known ported Master Chief model, then we'd deny it immediately, otherwise we'll always do our best but things will definitely slip through at times... we make it clear that it's the uploaders responsibility to make sure this is all in order beforehand. As I said in the porting thread, this is how Google operates with YouTube content and I believe it is fair to both sides.
-
OMG The new serenity firefly map for JKA is...
Link replied to Merek's topic in Jedi Knight General Discussions
... Any way That looks very impressive Hopefully it'll show up in the Files area soon. -
The readme was required before these changes o_o And as we said, if any content that is owned by the original author is reported (With supporting evidence) then it will be taken down, else, it stays up as we cannot verify if every file inside a .pk3 is legal or not. Fixed, although I simply entered "if reported" twice in error, so commas aren't needed
-
-
The readme is entirely up to the user as long as it contains information about the author including credits I should probably re-write that.
-
Welcome to the hub! I read that you model, got any examples to show off ?
-
Awesome, I'll get this organized soon should be awesome.
-
For the sake of not repeating myself, it's best reading my previous replies on the subject
-
T'was always my intention
-
You can go back and edit your files, you should have full rights over them unless anything changed whilst I was a staff last time By the way to sum the issue up in a sentence: Upload your files as normal, and if a request from another author whose work you've used makes a claim (With good evidence), your file will be taken down. This is the same approach Google has with YouTube content uploaded.
-
http://jkhub.org/topic/3027-site-technician/ http://jkhub.org/topic/981-jkhub-looking-for-more-staff There seem to have been other threads that were deleted e.g. when Fighter, Milamber, Circa etc applied. I wasn't around here when those took place so they'd have to explain that The great thing is, if you actually wish to help then you can simply just talk to a staff member or apply for a staff position any way. This isn't written anywhere (As I assume will be your next comment) however the point is, if you feel the community could benefit from your assistance or if you feel the staff is lacking in areas you could put a case forward much like you would if you walked into a store and gave them your CV/Résumé when job hunting. I suggested earlier on in this thread that you simply prove yourself before we give you any form of power on this site. Quite frankly your focus to criticize us and accuse us of bullshitting you whilst we are trying our best to brainstorm ideas with you is a bit troubling, we all work with each other in order to better to the community as a whole. There is a very big difference in criticism that is meant to further progress and criticism that is built from the get go to rattle cages. We are really trying here to potentially improve JKHub and bring in a whole other side to the community that perhaps could benefit from our website if we gave them a reason to visit and I hope you can contribute to this as I feel you probably could be a big part of that... we're not using you, we're simply asking for your help and all you seem focused on is becoming a member of staff in order to do this which is absolutely not the case as we could give you the permissions to the areas you need in order to do your role... Being a member of staff brings all the other responsibilities that have no relation to what you've said you'll do in this thread. This is taken completely out of context and quoted incorrectly... This is what I said: As you can see, I was trying to encourage you to advertise your competitive events on JKHub so that you could generate some interest. In what way isn't this encouraging? We're giving you a place to advertise events >_> As I said, it's a good idea to prove yourself capable of doing these things before we go any further. My agenda here is to help JKHub grow whilst making it a fun experience for all of its users, I hope you share that desire and that we can work together for the greater good of the community.
-
I cannot believe that you guys of all people don't see through what we're trying to say without saying it directly >_> Mods with content stolen/ported can be reported by the original author as being a copyright breach will be taken down. What does that mean for your file? It'll go through as we cannot check every file for direct permissions granted. If a legit concern is raised by the copyright owner, it'll be taken down. Is that more clear?
-
If a file is reported to have ripped content by the original author, and evidence is provided, then it will be taken down. Nothing has changed, we've just written it in black and white and made a procedure Ah that, that wasn't re-written and was there from the beginning I believe. We'll gladly clear that up as well shortly I'm going to be away this weekend, could another staff do that please? .
-
If we were looking for a position, you'd be able to apply by sending the JKHub account a private message. It would also be posted publicly so others could also apply.
-
Where does it say anything about torrents :blink:? Torrents themselves are perfectly legal. That readme is just a quick example, you can of course include your own (I'll reword that bit later)
-
Just as interested as we are in JK3, but unfortunately the community in JK2 is a lot smaller and it's difficult to get much content as regular. I think the best way would be to demonstrate you can provide this content we spoke about above, if you can then I can't imagine any one arguing about you being a reporter for JKHub In terms of demos/videos, where would you suggest a good place to look?
-
http://jkhub.org/topic/3327-files-area-changes/?do=findComment&comment=45268 Done
-
After weeks of discussions and suggestions from the community, we have gone ahead and changed a few things about our files area and the process in which they are hosted on our website. Updated policy The biggest change is our the update to our Files Submission Rules in our Rules page. We make it very clear our stance on illegally ported content as well as provide the author of the ripped content a way to remove the file in question. We hope that this now clears up a lot of issues and concerns users had with our old policy. External Content (Credits) Added We have now added a side area for displaying credit/content you have used in order to make your file: Footer reworded We have reworded our footer so it is now more helpful for authors and properly states who is responsible for this file. This goes alongside our new policy. Acknowledge Rules This now clearly asks the uploader if they agree to our File Submission Rules found on our Rules page. Click here to view the article