RcEnolc Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Ha, yes people still do play 1.00, eventhough its 'buggy' and 'glitchy', but I have found that to be half the fun of the game. After having to use openJK to even load JKA now, I was wondering if it is possibly for it to run 1.00, because from the looks of it, it contains 1.01, as I placed openJK into my 1.00 game? Thanks.
Stoiss Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 not possible and gameplay has not change at all from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1
ensiform Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 You people are weirdos. "Buggy" and "glitchy" in the same sentence as "fun". I don't even... And no, you will not be running any sort of official OpenJK with 1.00 (Codebase is 1.01 forked with no history). Kind of defeats the purpose of the project as it is. not possible and gameplay has not change at all from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1Actually it has a bit, but nothing saber core-gameplay wise. All of the ctf maps also got re-bsp'd also except for ctf3. Tempust85 likes this
Mysterious Stranger Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 That guy running OpenJK in 1.00 is a programmer/does his own coding. Perhaps you could hang around his servers and talk to him. Also CTF3 was also changed.
eezstreet Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 I thought that people played 1.00 because the blocks are "better" (read: buggy/compiled with buggy llvm). Wouldn't putting OJK in 1.00 ruin that?
Mysterious Stranger Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Goodness knows. Perhaps it is for the crash fixes...it seems to be a Linux server.
ensiform Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 That guy running OpenJK in 1.00 is a programmer/does his own coding. Perhaps you could hang around his servers and talk to him. Also CTF3 was also changed.Why would we care to? So he can change the protocol version and run a, `still buggy jampgame.so file` from 1.00 without the gamecode fixes. Big whoop. And no it was not. assets3.pk3 only contains 1,2,4,5.
Mysterious Stranger Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Oh no, my reply was to thread-starter since he was curious. Where did you get assets3...?
ensiform Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 It comes with/is the 1.01 patch... assets0-2 are gold release, assets3.pk3 is 1.01
RcEnolc Posted September 12, 2014 Author Posted September 12, 2014 Oh... kay... skipping the haters, and the people who clearly no longer actually play this game... So basically moving onto the staff member I saw post. The only reason I am using this is because other wise the game will not run with my processor (i7-4790k), I am just wondering if I deleted the 1.01/JA+ specific files it would work in 1.00? Now you people who seem to hate 'buggy' games, are the kind of people that buy the new COD game because its new... The gameplay IS different, and even though many people are trying to; it have JA+ servers/mods which completely ruin the game. (e.g. Fairytale admins).
Circa Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Now you people who seem to hate 'buggy' games, are the kind of people that buy the new COD game because its new... I don't see the issue in enjoying a game with no/minimal bugs. Also, I love and preorder every CoD game. I must be a chump, right? But really, nobody is "hating" on this really. @@Mysterious Stranger still plays regular as far as I know, and @@ensiform is a main developer for OpenJK. They both have some insight here. Let's keep it civil and not jump all over each other, people. (not singling anyone out with this statement, goes for everyone) therfiles and Stoiss like this
ensiform Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 The gameplay IS different, and even though many people are trying to; it have JA+ servers/mods which completely ruin the game. (e.g. Fairytale admins).So play on the servers which do not have mods installed at all.
afi Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 I already explained in some other thread why people are playing 1.0 and why I personally played 1.0 for a couple years. I don't want to write it all again but gameplay changes are definitely not the reason
ensiform Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 And those are personal reasons. Still doesn't change the fact that we will not provide any support to people wishing to run it with OpenJK.
Mysterious Stranger Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 I stopped playing when recently there was great drama...even in these end days of 1.00. Not worth my time. AFAIK you had your own server RcEnolc, if so why complain about others when you can stay in your own, as ensiform had said.
Artemis Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 Defeats the point of having that server since it's in 1.00... unless he wants to move it to 1.01. Enolc, do your other two nubs even have 1.01? If they could get it too, that'd give me a great excuse to try MME with y'all. You could even try it toooo.
eezstreet Posted September 14, 2014 Posted September 14, 2014 Oh... kay... skipping the haters, and the people who clearly no longer actually play this game... So basically moving onto the staff member I saw post. The only reason I am using this is because other wise the game will not run with my processor (i7-4790k), I am just wondering if I deleted the 1.01/JA+ specific files it would work in 1.00? Now you people who seem to hate 'buggy' games, are the kind of people that buy the new COD game because its new... The gameplay IS different, and even though many people are trying to; it have JA+ servers/mods which completely ruin the game. (e.g. Fairytale admins).You can't use OpenJK with 1.00 unless there's a modified version that works. @@ensiform told me a while ago on IRC that there's differences in the key networked structures, and a desync in these structures may lead to a crash ingame (or uh...other fun things..) For the record, I would rather have a game that functions better/has less bugs (and be virtually identical) than one that doesn't. I understand that there's personal reasons (tighter community) for playing 1.00, but outside of that, I can't really recommend it. (Could also play 1.01 base, there's plenty who play it fairly religiously)
Raz0r Posted September 14, 2014 Posted September 14, 2014 Obviously it would not be binary or network compatible with 1.01, but they didn't say they want that. It's totally possible, you'll just have to find someone willing to do that.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now