Futuza

I was under the impression jamme was for jk2, maybe I need to recheck the file download section.

I am eezstreet. *waves hand*

Is it just me or does this one look like Adam Sandler?

Are you sure your doublethink didn't make you think that way?

Such drama. Wow. Very heartbreaking.

I didn't vote because I don't own JK2, also I'm not sure what the right answer is.

Their clones, what's the difference?

http://jkhub.org/topic/1339-starkiller/

Necromancy... Don't you mean: OJP>BASE>MBII ? true : false;

I probably won't be on today, but I should have time to drop in tomorrow (just if you go looking for me). By the way: http://jkhub.org/topic/2127-npc-death-splash-damage NPC "objects".

Jedi Knight Galaxies could always use some more coders, you should drop by and chat with us: http://jkgalaxies.com/irc/ or irc:/irc.arloria.net/#jkgalaxies (since jkgalaxies.com exceeded its monthly bandwidth, oops) One hacky way of getting around the 'move objects' 'force grip objects', is by making objects which are actually inanimate npcs, this way they can still be gripped (and even have hp or 'durability' if you prefer!).

I think it'd be cool to see someone adapt some of those characters in a realistic way (instead of the cartoony style). It'd still give you a lot of creative freedom (at least with ones we don't see in the movies), and we'd get to see what the characters might look like if they were in a movie.

You should make a Rick Astley model.

Welcome young Jedi, I look forward to completing your training.

OpenJK's main goal is to provide compatibility / bug fix JKA. This is more of a feature, as a result it doesn't really belong in OpenJK. Also JKG's stuff was for npcs, not bots. JKG was never designed or intended to really have/support bots and as a result we've done very little to nothing with the existing bot code.

Poor @@Szico VII has a stalker...

The paths/routes just provide options to the bots. Basically it acts as a set of different directions or choices the AI decision tree can make, without a bot route thogh it doesn't have any route to follow, so it just defaults to stupid behavior which involves wandering the level randomly while spamming force jump. Bots are designed to attack closest enemy available that it encouters along its route; however, if the enemy gets too far away from it, it will ignore the enemy and just continue down the bot route it has chosen. Forcing bots to walk would simply make them extremely easy to kill, I think this was designed that way on purpose so it wouldn't be so easy to kill them. Like Xycaleth says though, the npc/bot ai code needs a workover, but that's a massive undertaking that will require someone with motivationandl lots of time and experience with AI coding.

Oh I remember Descent, that little triangle spaceshipy game?

Pretty much yes it does. Otherwise you get stupid jumping behavior. The single-player npc ai is much better in many cases, but yeah the bots depend on boute routes.

Whenever you have the chat bubble over your head (menu/console/chat), you are invulnerable, at least with the default settings from what I remember. And yes it can be used. Also JA+ community has this bizzare thing where, if your saber is unignited, you are apparently role-playing and no one is allowed to attack you or risk getting banned. Like...wtf?

Pakscape is pretty old I guess, I dunno I have a working version of Windows 3 if that counts. I don't use it though, just stays on its floppy for kicks and giggles.

This is what they do when they don't have a bot route for the map.

Lame drama is lame? Why the heck would I want to get involved? I find it hilarious though how people make such a big deal out of getting "lamed".

Well not exactly since it isn't required, or wanted by a lot of users. I mean it'd be nice I suppose if you install one redistributables windows update always checks to see if new redistributables are available as well, or something.