ERROR: MAX_ORIGINAL_EDGES - what is this?

[Langerd]

How to fix it? It is in the first compiling part and then it stops everything.

[Apprentice]

Did you try Google ??

[Langerd]

Yep i only find that "That error is caused by lots of tiny brushes most of the time." I deleted them and still ... nothing

[Szico VII]

Sometimes CSG Subtract makes brushes which cause this. Avoid i like the plague.

[Langerd]

It works. It was because that i rotate too many cones too many times.

[Langerd]

Damn... Again. I think it is because i rotate too many cilinders D: Because i made a senate platforms , Copy two of them and I was rotating them.

[Apprentice]

Are those cylinder brushes detail or structural ??

[MoonDog]

Are those cylinder brushes detail or structural ??

 

A patch mesh is not a volume. It is a plane that has no effect on vis either way, and therefore it does not matter whether or not it is structural or detail. Unless you mean he has taken a brush and clipped into a cylinder of course.

 

Damn... Again. I think it is because i rotate too many cilinders D: Because i made a senate platforms , Copy two of them and I was rotating them.

 

Be careful with free rotation. Also, do not touch CSG subtract. Ever. Like Szico says.

[Langerd]

I removed them. My friend will make a md3 model of them. He said that I exceed the number of triangles. He was right i think ... because i use many things that created them. I deleted all the platforms and now it works. If i will make the md3 models it will be better idea?

And one question... If i will make a cycle using a brush not a using a patch cilidner it will be worst or better?

[Apprentice]

I removed them. My friend will make a md3 model of them. He said that I exceed the number of triangles. He was right i think ... because i use many things that created them. I deleted all the platforms and now it works. If i will make the md3 models it will be better idea?

It might. In certain situations it's better to make a portion an MD3 or an ASE model instead of brushwork . . .

[Langerd]

Hmm  I think it is a good idea but i am afraid of one thing... If i will make the model solid function I will create a triangles? Because i saw somewhere that in the misc_model  spawnflags 2 is not a good idea :/

[Boothand]

I think the "solid" spawnflag is quite safe on larger models with bigger triangles. It's known to be problematic on detailed models though, as I understand it.

[MoonDog]

If you need to have a piece of brushwork and patches be able to be a modular asset that you can rotate, it's best to compile that object into an ASE and use it as a misc_model.

 

You'll create a lot of clip brushes with autoclipping. It's best to clip the object as simply as possible manually, using as few brushes as possible. Autoclipping will take every triangle in the model and create a clip brush.

[Langerd]

The platform in Gtk looks like that
A too many of them crushed the program... Soo my friend from the clan will make the md3 model of it.

http://s845.photobucket.com/user/makskosa/media/platform1_zps58f0aff5.png.html?sort=3&o=0

[Langerd]

If you need to have a piece of brushwork and patches be able to be a modular asset that you can rotate, it's best to compile that object into an ASE and use it as a misc_model.

 

You'll create a lot of clip brushes with autoclipping. It's best to clip the object as simply as possible manually, using as few brushes as possible. Autoclipping will take every triangle in the model and create a clip brush.

Yeah i was expecting that D: I must be careful . Anyway Many thanks guys for help ^^