Silverfang Posted December 21, 2015 Posted December 21, 2015 Weapons of the UniverseWe have more than just blasters you know... Blasters are great, their destructive capabilities are certainly impressionable and the sounds they make are certainly recognizable. By default, they are:Effective against armorEffective against organic targetsWeak against shieldsAverage against electrical systems such as droids and vehiclesSome blasters use ion-based rounds:Effective against armorWeak against organic targetsEffective against shieldingVery effective against electrical systems Slugthrowers are a physical projectile based weapon, often using volatile chemicals to propel them at lethal speeds. They are at worst a primitive technology and at best outdated, however they still see some use especially in the outer rim and for specific situations by bounty hunters. By default, they are:Ineffective against armorEffective against organic targetsCompletely ignore most shieldingVirtually useless against electrical systemsThey can also:Cause targets to bleed over timeAccelerated Charged Particle weapons, or ACP for short are often mistaken at first for slugthrowers, however they are more akin to blasters. By default they are:Ineffective against armorEffective against organic targetsEffective against shieldingIneffective against electrical systemsPulse weapons utilize fusion plasma to deliver high velocity "balls of death". By default they:Completely ignore armor, and areSomewhat effective against organic targetsIneffective against shieldingSomewhat effective against electrical systemsIon based weapons are like concentrated EMP blasts, providing an extremely effective way to deal with droids. By default they:Completely ignore most armor, and areVirtually useless against organic targetsExtremely effective against shieldsExtremely effective against electrical systemsElectrical based weapons are literal lightning casters, they are more lethal to organic targets than ion weapons, but not quite as effective against droids By default they are:Somewhat effective against armorSomewhat effective against organic targetsEffective against shieldsEffective against electrical systemsSonic based weapons are an expensive technology that it is hard-hitting enough to knock down most average sized targets. By default they are:Somewhat effective against armorSomewhat effective against organic targetsSomewhat effective against shieldsIneffective against electrical targetsThey can also:Knock down targets Cold based weapons provide a whole new weather element in an otherwise non-hostile environment, non-insulated targets will suffer frostbite and anyone caught with a direct hit will find it hard to move By default they are:Ineffective against armorSomewhat effective against organic targetsEffective against shieldsIneffective against electrical systemsThey also:Cause targets to be slowedIn extreme cases, cause the target to be frozen in iceFire based weapons cause burning damage over time, wide-spread panic and make starting campfires fun By default they are:Ineffective against armorVery effective against organic targetsNegated by shieldsIneffective against electrical systemsThey can also:Cause targets to be set on fire and take damage over timeThis can include shielded targetsIs less likely to set fire to armored targetsThere are also less common damage types like Carbonite (similar to cold damage), Slash (similar to slug damage), and Impact (fists, blunt weapons, etc). To protect against these damage you have 2 main ways, armor and shielding Armor:Will reduce all damage to the limb it is attached to, even against weapons that deal more damage to armor (with the exception of Pulse and Ion damage)Most armor will reduce movement speed, but substantially increase effective healthSome armor will also provide a small increase to maximum health when equippedShielding:Will completely negate damage as long as it holds (with the exception of Slug, Slash, and Impact damage)Recharges, with different rates depending on the shield itemDoes not benefit from armor damage reduction Feedback welcome Evian, Futuza, Smoo and 1 other like this
Futuza Posted December 21, 2015 Posted December 21, 2015 We've also talked about special kind of shielding and armor that is somewhat effective in reducing lightsaber inflicted damage, such as cortosis weave armor. However, this will likely be a later addition and still needs to be fleshed out. By implementing this, it helps provide a purpose and use for players to opt to use vibroblades instead of traditional lightsabers in some situations. Additionally, we wanted to stop fire damage with water (hopping into water when you're on fire will put it out) and with crouch-rolls (you know...stop drop and roll). Smoo likes this
Silverfang Posted December 21, 2015 Author Posted December 21, 2015 Water does in fact already puts out fire (demonstrated in the fire damage and efx developer diary video), however rolling does not yet. Smoo likes this
eezstreet Posted December 21, 2015 Posted December 21, 2015 Rolling has a 50% chance of removing fire effects, as demonstrated by this snippet: else { //otherwise send us into the roll pm->ps->legsTimer = 0; pm->ps->legsAnim = 0; PM_SetAnim(SETANIM_BOTH,rolled,SETANIM_FLAG_OVERRIDE|SETANIM_FLAG_HOLD); PM_AddEventWithParm( EV_ROLL, 0 ); pm->maxs[2] = pm->ps->crouchheight;//CROUCH_MAXS_2; pm->ps->viewheight = DEFAULT_VIEWHEIGHT; pm->ps->pm_flags &= ~PMF_DUCKED; pm->ps->pm_flags |= PMF_ROLLING; // Remove fire damage...some of the time. Jumping into water is a better bet --eez #ifdef _GAME if(Q_irand(1,2) == 1) { JKG_RemoveDamageType((gentity_t *)pm_entSelf, DT_FIRE); } #endif Also, you have to be almost completely submerged in water (just enough that you are swimming) in order for fire to be removed from being in water. While you are swimming, you are also completely immune to fire. Note that @@Silverfang says "by default." Some weapons can be better than average at these. For instance, sniper rifles have armor piercing capability which allows them to ignore some (or all) of an armor piece's DR. It can also be based on the ammo. Slugthrowers can have armor piercing rounds to help mitigate their weakness towards armor, while stinger ion rounds help ion weapons be better at dealing with things other than droids and shields. Here are all of the damage types: // Bit of damage types stuff here... typedef enum damageType_e { DT_DISINTEGRATE, DT_ELECTRIC, DT_EXPLOSION, DT_FIRE, DT_FREEZE, DT_IMPLOSION, DT_STUN, DT_CARBONITE, DT_BLASTER, DT_SLUG, DT_ACP, DT_PULSE, DT_ION, DT_SONIC, DT_BLEED, DT_COLD, NUM_DAMAGE_TYPES } damageType_t; Note that Implosion and Stun aren't used. Cold and Freeze are different because cold slows the target while Freeze locks them in place. Fire removes all Cold and Freeze effects. Disintegrate just does the disintegrate effect when a player is killed by it, there is no other difference. Smoo likes this
eezstreet Posted November 11, 2016 Posted November 11, 2016 So now that I've finished all of the other hugemajor parts of 1.3.0, I can start working on this.The question is, how should, for instance, Cold v Armor be determined? Should it be determined via a damagetypes.json where the values can be customized? And maybe have the damage block in the .wpn file override some things? Or?
Silverfang Posted November 12, 2016 Author Posted November 12, 2016 Weapons may specifically have properties to increase their effectiveness against certain things that they are normally weak to. I think default damage multipliers gathered in one file (I assume that's what you mean by damagetypes.json) with optional overrides in .wpn files is the way to go. Question: Will future items (as in variants/qualities/etc. of items) be individual .wpn files for each one or will the extra properties they gain be determined in the itm files?
eezstreet Posted November 12, 2016 Posted November 12, 2016 Weapons may specifically have properties to increase their effectiveness against certain things that they are normally weak to. I think default damage multipliers gathered in one file (I assume that's what you mean by damagetypes.json) with optional overrides in .wpn files is the way to go. Question: Will future items (as in variants/qualities/etc. of items) be individual .wpn files for each one or will the extra properties they gain be determined in the itm files?I'm not sure yet. I think weapons for right now should have the same modifiers, and we can think about adding it to weapons when the need to balance arises.
eezstreet Posted November 13, 2016 Posted November 13, 2016 Question: What is a disruptor? Is it Pulse? Or Blaster type?
Darth Sion Posted November 13, 2016 Posted November 13, 2016 Question: What is a disruptor? Is it Pulse? Or Blaster type?A disruptor is a Blaster type. Even if it has a charge mechanism, it's still considered a Blaster type.
eezstreet Posted November 13, 2016 Posted November 13, 2016 It's been implemented.In hindsight, I suspect what semblance of balance there was before is now very much out the window, seeing as how the ACP Array Gun does 20% more damage across the board, slugthrower ignores shields, and the pulse shotgun goes right through armor. Blasters are going to have to be cheaper probably to compensate.
Silverfang Posted November 13, 2016 Author Posted November 13, 2016 Yeah, generally speaking this probably adds (EVEN MORE) damage overall than it takes away. Once armor actually has damage reduction it should be okay though. Then we can start looking at status effects to buff up damage even more!I should note though that Particle Shields (also called Shift Shields) actually do work against slugthrowers.
Futuza Posted November 13, 2016 Posted November 13, 2016 So in regards to shields being changed players no longer start out with a bonus 25 health (from the old shield) and have EVEN LESS health by default than before as a result. Would a change like 125-150 hp as the default be an okay way to help balance this? (Plus I'm thinking eventually in LMO phases, characters will have less or more hp than 100, depending on their level. So its supposed to vary a little eventually, anyway).
eezstreet Posted November 13, 2016 Posted November 13, 2016 So in regards to shields being changed players no longer start out with a bonus 25 health (from the old shield) and have EVEN LESS health by default than before as a result. Would a change like 125-150 hp as the default be an okay way to help balance this? (Plus I'm thinking eventually in LMO phases, characters will have less or more hp than 100, depending on their level. So its supposed to vary a little eventually, anyway).You start with 100 health and no shields, correct. I actually think this is fine, it makes the gameplay a little faster to start. It takes now two less shots to kill someone with the starter pistol (5->3) because of changes to the damage types involved. Onysfx and Smoo like this
hleV Posted November 14, 2016 Posted November 14, 2016 So wait, do slugthrowers really completely ignore shielding, or are completed ignored by shielding?
eezstreet Posted November 14, 2016 Posted November 14, 2016 They go straight through shields. hleV likes this
Futuza Posted November 16, 2016 Posted November 16, 2016 I have implemented Poison damage type in develop and put in a new test weapon for it called grenade_poison. Poison currently does 10% of your current health and then tapers off to 1 dmg over time. (If 10% is less than 1dmg, just does 1 dmg). You also have a 50% chance to resist poison damage each cycle it occurs. Poison does not affect droids and does 1.1x damage against organics. Might need to reduce this a bit with some balance testing, it's a little weird since it does more damage to full hp players and less to low hp players. I have also adjusted bleed damage so that you only have a 4/10 chance of bleeding each cycle and it does overall less damage before (cuz lol 38 dmg from one shot was way too much). Now it does 1 - 2 dmg per cycle (I think cycles are about 0.5 seconds) and lasts for about 3.5 seconds.
Silverfang Posted November 16, 2016 Author Posted November 16, 2016 We shouldn't include too many "chances" to take damage, it should just be a reduced amount of damage or bleed until you take X damage with a certain chance to not take damage for that tick. eezstreet and Onysfx like this
Onysfx Posted November 16, 2016 Posted November 16, 2016 We shouldn't include too many "chances" to take damage, it should just be a reduced amount of damage or bleed until you take X damage with a certain chance to not take damage for that tick.Also you shouldn't bleed once you reach super low hp. This will make it so the enemy with have to finish you off with one last shot. Not as much fun when you die of bleeding and your opponent doesn't get to finish you off himself (or herself or theyself, to include the non binary genders) tldr: You should never die from bleeding, once you reach 1 hp, you no longer bleed. eezstreet likes this
Silverfang Posted November 17, 2016 Author Posted November 17, 2016 Current thoughts on damage:4% of current health (rounded down, minimum 1) per second for 5 secondsif below 20% of total health, deal 1 damage per 2 seconds instead.if at 1 HP, stop bleeding. Originally I wanted you to be able to bleed to death, now I'm thinking there will be a separate type of bleed damage that can cause death from bleeding, this will require separate balancing though (for example, it will not be based off of current health) Onysfx likes this
Futuza Posted November 17, 2016 Posted November 17, 2016 Current thoughts on damage: 4% of current health (rounded down, minimum 1) per second for 5 secondsif below 20% of total health, deal 1 damage per 2 seconds instead.if at 1 HP, stop bleeding. Originally I wanted you to be able to bleed to death, now I'm thinking there will be a separate type of bleed damage that can cause death from bleeding, this will require separate balancing though (for example, it will not be based off of current health)I made most of the changes, except for the below 20% health part earlier today, but I can add that in. EDIT: It is in. I'm not sure I agree though with the not being able to bleed to death. Having two different types of bleed damage seems a bit weird and unnecessary to me.
Onysfx Posted November 17, 2016 Posted November 17, 2016 I've always found bleeding to death in games very annoying. It's like if your at low hp, what's the point in running now? I'm just going to die anyway. I would definitely be up for a limping animation when at low hp. I believe RPG-X for elite force does something like this.
Futuza Posted November 17, 2016 Posted November 17, 2016 I've always found bleeding to death in games very annoying. It's like if your at low hp, what's the point in running now?This is what I would hope would make things like bacta useful. Dalo Lorn likes this
Futuza Posted May 17, 2022 Posted May 17, 2022 As a note regarding up coming changes in v1.3.23, ACP damage has been modified from the original post's description. ACP now functions as something that partially hits shields and partially penetrates. The default is for 50% of the damage to bypass the shield and the other 50% to impact on the shield. The actual ratio can be determine in the weapon file by specifying a value for "ACPRatio", which determines which portion of the ACP damage impacts on the shield/vs what bypasses it. eg: 0.4 == 40% direct dmg, 60% shield damage. As an example, using 0.4 ACPRatio, a weapon that does 30 ACP damage, would result in 12 damage being guaranteed to bypass the shield, and 18 damage impacting on the shield. If the player were also armored, the direct bypass damage would also be reduced like normal. ACP damage also applies a bleed debuff like slugthrowers do.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now