Acrobat Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 http://forums.warchest.com/showthread.php/37058-gtkradiant-1-4-or-1-5-doesn-t-run-well-in-windows-8-mouse-locks-onto-ceiling Well last time I dl'd it, it didn't even have a jk2 or jka option. I compile jk2 maps while it's set on jka settings all the time (u just have to know which triggers not to use) but if it lacks either one, then I don't see how I could use it. Link to comment
Xycaleth Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I think @@mrwonko made a Jka game pack for gtkradiant 1.6. Or it might have been TheOneAndOnly. Link to comment
Acrobat Posted August 28, 2013 Author Share Posted August 28, 2013 link? would be nice to have a tutorial on how to install it Link to comment
mrwonko Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant-gamepacks/JAPack is the JAPack. I did not make it, I deleted redundant models (included as ASE and MD3 or those already in the assets*.pk3) to reduce its size. Thanks to that it's now small enough to be included in Radiant builds, like the latest one at http://gtkradiant.s3.amazonaws.com/GtkRadiant-1.6.4-20130824.zip. Link to comment
CaptainCrazy Posted August 29, 2013 Share Posted August 29, 2013 link? would be nice to have a tutorial on how to install it Probably no good to you but i followed this tutorial when installing GtkRadiant, maybe you're talking about something else though xD Link to comment
The One and Only Posted August 29, 2013 Share Posted August 29, 2013 I think @@mrwonko made a Jka game pack for gtkradiant 1.6. Or it might have been TheOneAndOnly. Nope, mine was for NetRadiant. Link to comment
Acrobat Posted September 11, 2013 Author Share Posted September 11, 2013 It really aggravates me off that my computer should be able to compile a large map in 60 seconds, but this old software turns it into something more like 60 minutes. My computer is 64 bit and I have about 64 megs of ram. Should compile this stuff in no time flat so makes me not want to map. Link to comment
MoonDog Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Generally, people seem to be confused about using 1.6.3 or assume that it is completely unusable for JKA. This is not the case. You can use 1.6.3 for JKA with no negative affects that I have found. 1.6.3 and 1.4.0 are very similar in most respects. So why should you switch? For one, 1.6.x is being actively developed. This means that when you have issues, you can actually report them to their GitHub and have your issue looked into. Another one is that if there are features you'd like to see after having used 1.6.x you can suggest them. In any case, here are some of the things I have found that are an improvement over 1.4.0 so far. Easier to read fonts Better file browser(It's basically 1.5.0's) Texture tool. If you work in brush primitives, it's basically like UVmapping a plane over a texture. Quite cool. [Active support. More important than you might think. Possibility of suggesting new features. Anyway, Installing 1.6.3 is actually quite simple! First, acquire the editor itself from this page. It's not a packed installer like the previous versions. The entire editor is packaged in a zip. So, you can extract it directly in X:\Program Files\ Or wherever you'd like it. I like to keep mine in Program Files for consistency. At any rate, you are going to need the JKA pack before doing anything. So, go into the GtkRadiant-1.6-20121007 folder(Where ever you extracted it to) and find the "installs" folder. The JKA pack is stored online to be downloaded VIA svn.(subversion) This means we need an SVN client. I highly recommend Tortoise for beginners because it's quite easy to understand. If you know what you are doing, skip that step and get yourself a command line svn. Anyway, download the appropriate Tortoise SVN from this page. Install Tortoise SVN and let it do everything it requires. Once you have finished, you'll have the option to SVN Checkout directly into a folder by right clicking. So, return to the "installs" folder in the GtkRadiant-1.6-20121007 folder. Right click anywhere in the blank space and find the SVN Checkout option. Click it. You'll get a Checkout file dialogue. In URL of repository: Copy and paste the following. svn://svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant-gamepacks/JAPack/trunk/ Make sure Checkout directory: matches the path to the JAPack folder.(it should make the JAPack folder automatically) X:\X\GtkRadiant-1.6-20121007\installs\JAPack\ (Your path will obviously reflect the location to which you originally extracted 1.6. Make sure there is a JAPack path after \installs\ in the Checkout directory. It should do it automatically. However, double check.) Once you've verified all the paths are correct, press OK. It may take a while because the pack is quite large. (The pack includes all the models, so that is why.) Once it finishes, you may now finally execute radiant.exe in your GtkRadiant-1.6-20121007 folder. (Run as administrator if you have UAC turned on. You know, that annoying dialogue that pops up and asks if you're sure you want to run the program.) A quick note. It may take a while for it to actually start up it's first time. Wait patiently. It's not broken. Go make coffee, take a shower, clean your windows etc... Once it finally starts up, you'll be able to successfully indicate Jedi Academy as the game you'd like to map for. If you encounter any errors check the following: Did you follow all the steps to get JAPack via svn? Are all your Jedi Academy assets properly installed in correct paths? Did you run radiant as administrator if you have UAC turned on? Link to comment
Xycaleth Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 It really aggravates me off that my computer should be able to compile a large map in 60 seconds, but this old software turns it into something more like 60 minutes. My computer is 64 bit and I have about 64 megs of ram. Should compile this stuff in no time flat so makes me not want to map.Throwing more memory at your computer won't make it run faster. The limiting factor in compiling maps (and especially the lighting stage) is your CPU. This is why movie CG is rendered using multiple servers, each running the calculations on graphics card (which are very well suited to lighting calculations). Link to comment
mrwonko Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 The JKA pack is stored online to be downloaded VIA svn.(subversion) This means we need an SVN client. I highly recommend Tortoise for beginners because it's quite easy to understand. If you know what you are doing, skip that step and get yourself a command line svn. Anyway, download the appropriate Tortoise SVN from this page. Install Tortoise SVN and let it do everything it requires. Once you have finished, you'll have the option to SVN Checkout directly into a folder by right clicking. So, return to the "installs" folder in the GtkRadiant-1.6-20121007 folder. Right click anywhere in the blank space and find the SVN Checkout option. Click it. You'll get a Checkout file dialogue. In URL of repository: Copy and paste the following. svn://svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant-gamepacks/JAPack/trunk/ Make sure Checkout directory: matches the path to the JAPack folder.(it should make the JAPack folder automatically) X:\X\GtkRadiant-1.6-20121007\installs\JAPack\ (Your path will obviously reflect the location to which you originally extracted 1.6. Make sure there is a JAPack path after \installs\ in the Checkout directory. It should do it automatically. However, double check.) Once you've verified all the paths are correct, press OK. It may take a while because the pack is quite large. (The pack includes all the models, so that is why.) This is outdated. The JAPack is now included by default (since it's been optimized for size).It really aggravates me off that my computer should be able to compile a large map in 60 seconds, but this old software turns it into something more like 60 minutes. My computer is 64 bit and I have about 64 megs of ram. Should compile this stuff in no time flat so makes me not want to map.64MB Ram? Wow! Joking aside, this made me curious as to whether the compile could be sped up. I have enough work on my hands so no promises, but if you could send me a map that takes forever and the settings you use to compile it I might try to investigate why it's so slow and what can be done about it. I'm afraid major speedups won't be possible without major changes though... Link to comment
CaptainCrazy Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 64MB????? Damn that sucks i have 6Gig of RAM and a GPU with 2Gig on it, it's amazing you can do anything! lol. ChalklYne likes this Link to comment
Xycaleth Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Acrobat obviously meant GB Link to comment
Szico VII Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 64GB of RAM seems just as unlikely as 64MB to me ChalklYne likes this Link to comment
CaptainCrazy Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 64GB of RAM seems just as unlikely as 64MB to me Is 64Gig even possible and if it is it seems like overkill to me lol. Link to comment
Xycaleth Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 64GB is definitely more likely than 64MB. Link to comment
ChalklYne Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 sure about 6-7 maybe 8 hundred bux u can getcha a 64gb stick. But isn't the compile time limited by the coding of the actual programs? Like even if you had a terrabyte of ram wouldnt it be limited as to what q3map could do codewise?? Link to comment
Szico VII Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Unless youre using the >4GB version uploaded here and a 64bit OS it cant utilise more than 2GB anyway. Link to comment
ChalklYne Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 i hate to spam the thread but what would you have to do in order to use the entire cubic area in gtk in one map? code mod? new engine? Link to comment
mrwonko Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 i hate to spam the thread but what would you have to do in order to use the entire cubic area in gtk in one map? code mod? new engine?What problems arise if you try? You'll need to increase the view distance and portal distance and lightmapscale? So why don't you just start a new topic since you have an entirely unrelated new question?Unless youre using the >4GB version uploaded here and a 64bit OS it cant utilise more than 2GB anyway.Well, if it were to run out of RAM it'd crash with "safe_malloc failed" instead of taking forever. Link to comment
Acrobat Posted September 12, 2013 Author Share Posted September 12, 2013 Unless youre using the >4GB version uploaded here and a 64bit OS it cant utilise more than 2GB anyway. I recall trying that thing, and I opened by task manager to see how much ram it was using, and it was using 2gb. I asked Obsidian and he said it was probably working just fine as it only occasionally would go over 2 gb anyways, but idk I wasn't that impressed but I didn't really do timed comparisons between the two. And ya I meant 64 gigs of ram. My processor is an overclocked itel core 7 3930 at 4.1 ghz. It's eight X 8 GB of DD3 1866 mhz ripjaws.My hard drive is entirely solid state so my computer boots up in like 3 seconds. And it can run crysis 3 on 2560X1600 resolution maxed out settings and it stays locked at the default fps without deviating. It's kind of a beast This is a similar looking PC with same frame that the company makes. It's called a talon model. Link to comment
mrwonko Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 I recall trying that thing, and I opened by task manager to see how much ram it was using, and it was using 2gb. I asked Obsidian and he said it was probably working just fine as it only occasionally would go over 2 gb anyways, but idk I wasn't that impressed but I didn't really do timed comparisons between the two.It's not meant to use more Ram, it just keeps it from crashing if it does. Link to comment
Acrobat Posted September 12, 2013 Author Share Posted September 12, 2013 idk what u could do with my map anyway. It won't compile without lomem so u know. I am pretty good at the -vis phase stuff so Idk how much more optimizing can me done. The map is about 10 times the size of any other map. Have u played it? I'd like to make another add version at some point. http://jkhub.org/files/file/1422-expedition/ Here's from the readme in which I listed the basic compile settings and world spawn settings. Let me know what u would change if anything. And yes I need lightmapscal of 8 for it to compile. It goes crazy if I much below that. Compile Information bsp_q3map2/q3map2: (final) BSP -meta -notjunc, -vis, -light -fast -samples 2 -lomem note it was compiled using 2.5.16 q3map2 compiler, which is not the default compiler of gtkradiant 1.4.In case any other jk2 mappers try a dot product shader (terrain blending), they must update the compiler oruse gtkradiant 1.5 for their compiling since it comes with an updated compiler. This is the tutorial that Iused for terrain blendinghttp://www.simonoc.c.../terrain1_1.htm I used DarthG's new_system.pk3 mostly for its subtle_hint shaders but I also used some of the pack'scaulk_water shaders and a few others. I'm not sure where I downloaded, but this thread at least talks about it.http://www.map-craft...ight=subtlehint ---------------------------------------------------------------- Worldspawn Information _lightmapscale 8_blocksize 0_chopsize 0ambient 15 Link to comment
Szico VII Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Thats exactly when the >2GB version is useful - it'll compile without needing lomem, thus often drastically reducing compile times. Also useful if you get safe_malloc in the -meta stage (yes, it can happen) as theres no -lomem switch for that. Link to comment
Acrobat Posted September 13, 2013 Author Share Posted September 13, 2013 Thats exactly when the >2GB version is useful - it'll compile without needing lomem, thus often drastically reducing compile times. Also useful if you get safe_malloc in the -meta stage (yes, it can happen) as theres no -lomem switch for that. ah I see. Ya that could speed things up perhaps. btw i dont like how u cant see the red line if there is a leak in this GUI thing. ..and that's why my computer was probably still using 2 gigs with it only. I will have to reformat my computer before I try this thought. gtk is all messed up right now. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now