Talk:Tournament: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Do you think that we should use the name of the teams/players that were actually used in the respective tournament or the name that is most known? It becomes complicated when ...") |
m (comment) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do you think that we should use the name of the teams/players that were actually used in the respective tournament or the name that is most known? It becomes complicated when an ESL team changed the name and the players while it's actually the "same" ESL-team (e.g. xeTox->aXiom->WSH or aXiom->JK) | Do you think that we should use the name of the teams/players that were actually used in the respective tournament or the name that is most known? It becomes complicated when an ESL team changed the name and the players while it's actually the "same" ESL-team (e.g. xeTox->aXiom->WSH or aXiom->JK) | ||
--[[User:Balthor|Balthor]] ([[User talk:Balthor|talk]]) 11:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC) | --[[User:Balthor|Balthor]] ([[User talk:Balthor|talk]]) 11:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
Good question. As you can see, I just picked the name that they are most well known by, so it's zentur1o the entire time and not EviLWindu, anemic etc. But we should be careful, since axiom and JK are different, even though they're technically the same team on the ESL that merely renamed. In those cases, we should go for the names they actually used in the tournament, which you can find by comparing the date of the tournament to the history log of the team, since the tournament page always gives the current name and the history log has all the correct details. So your change of axiom to WSH for the Winter Games is correct, for example, but corona vs bioxar is right for this one: http://www.esl.eu/de/jkja/tdm/openingcup/match/5021535/ even if the page says BHK vs sA or something, and xetox is right for #1 on this one http://www.esl.eu/eu/jkja/tdm/tdmeaster07/rankings/ since they were called xetox at that time (04.07) if you check the team logs. --[[User:Masta|Masta]] ([[User talk:Masta|talk]]) 11:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:39, 21 April 2014
Do you think that we should use the name of the teams/players that were actually used in the respective tournament or the name that is most known? It becomes complicated when an ESL team changed the name and the players while it's actually the "same" ESL-team (e.g. xeTox->aXiom->WSH or aXiom->JK) --Balthor (talk) 11:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Good question. As you can see, I just picked the name that they are most well known by, so it's zentur1o the entire time and not EviLWindu, anemic etc. But we should be careful, since axiom and JK are different, even though they're technically the same team on the ESL that merely renamed. In those cases, we should go for the names they actually used in the tournament, which you can find by comparing the date of the tournament to the history log of the team, since the tournament page always gives the current name and the history log has all the correct details. So your change of axiom to WSH for the Winter Games is correct, for example, but corona vs bioxar is right for this one: http://www.esl.eu/de/jkja/tdm/openingcup/match/5021535/ even if the page says BHK vs sA or something, and xetox is right for #1 on this one http://www.esl.eu/eu/jkja/tdm/tdmeaster07/rankings/ since they were called xetox at that time (04.07) if you check the team logs. --Masta (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)