Talk:Holocron: Difference between revisions
Add topic (Created page with "It's bad having so many red/broken links, especially as some of the pages you linked to exist but with slightly different names. --~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's bad having so many red/broken links, especially as some of the pages you linked to exist but with slightly different names. --[[User:Balthor|Balthor]] ([[User talk:Balthor|talk]]) 15:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC) | It's bad having so many red/broken links, especially as some of the pages you linked to exist but with slightly different names. --[[User:Balthor|Balthor]] ([[User talk:Balthor|talk]]) 15:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
- In time the links would update and become more viable. They would eventually redirect to existing pages, which haven't been created just yet. [[User:NumberWan|NumberWan]] ([[User talk:NumberWan|talk]]) 13:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
It's still better using valid links if you have the chance to --[[User:Balthor|Balthor]] ([[User talk:Balthor|talk]]) 11:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:18, 2 September 2015
It's bad having so many red/broken links, especially as some of the pages you linked to exist but with slightly different names. --Balthor (talk) 15:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- In time the links would update and become more viable. They would eventually redirect to existing pages, which haven't been created just yet. NumberWan (talk) 13:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
It's still better using valid links if you have the chance to --Balthor (talk) 11:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)