Editing Talk:Mouse Movement Techniques
Add topicThe edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Nobody in the competitive community uses 'poke' for 'aim' or 'spin' (they don't call 'aim' anything and they call 'spin'.. well, spin; in fact, it would seem really silly for anyone to say poke to something that is a spin). I should have been more exact in the article: It's not that all english speakers got confused, because the Brits learned about the term poke quickly via the esl and the Americans (prior to playing on the esl) just used the term 'wiggle' and later on used poke and wiggle interchangeably (everyone would regardless of time never consider using the term poke for spin though; the term aim was only used by few people, most didn't have a word for it). The confusion only comes about in people unfamiliar with competitive play, so they use 'poke' for both aim and wiggle. This is exactly the kind of distinction I made in the article and I will set out to correct the deficiency. --[[User:Masta|Masta]] ([[User talk:Masta|talk]]) 14:32, 5 March 2013 (EST) | Nobody in the competitive community uses 'poke' for 'aim' or 'spin' (they don't call 'aim' anything and they call 'spin'.. well, spin; in fact, it would seem really silly for anyone to say poke to something that is a spin). I should have been more exact in the article: It's not that all english speakers got confused, because the Brits learned about the term poke quickly via the esl and the Americans (prior to playing on the esl) just used the term 'wiggle' and later on used poke and wiggle interchangeably (everyone would regardless of time never consider using the term poke for spin though; the term aim was only used by few people, most didn't have a word for it). The confusion only comes about in people unfamiliar with competitive play, so they use 'poke' for both aim and wiggle. This is exactly the kind of distinction I made in the article and I will set out to correct the deficiency. --[[User:Masta|Masta]] ([[User talk:Masta|talk]]) 14:32, 5 March 2013 (EST) | ||